The Labour MP launched a scathing attack on the Chancellor arguing the Government is acting in a way that suggests "hatred" towards Greater Manchester. Mr Gwynne accused Rishi Sunak of favouring his own town over Greater Manchester in the allocation of extra funds to fight the coronavirus pandemic. But the Chancellor blasted back: "It's disappointing to hear the Honourable Gentleman's tone.
"It's obviously a very difficult time for many people in this country as we evolve our response to this virus.
"But what we need is people acting in a constructive spirit and that's what my Honourable Friend the Community Secretary is offering to do.
"And I hope those conversations are happening as we speak.
"Greater Manchester is being treated exactly the same as every part of our United Kingdom.
"These are national support schemes that we put in place, that help the most vulnerable in our society.
"He raises a number of questions, as he will know there are a number of schemes to protect businesses, to protect employees and provide support to his local authority."
Rishi Sunak responded to accusations he 'hates' Greater Manchester
Addressing the Commons, the Chancellor failed to rule out harsher lockdown measures when challenged by Labour, but added that a "localised approach is the best approach".
During Treasury questions, his Labour opposite number Anneliese Dodds asked: "Last week when the Prime Minister was asked whether a circuit-breaker was likely he said 'I rule nothing out'. Does the Chancellor rule it out, yes or no?"
Mr Sunak replied: "Of course, I agree with the Prime Minister."
Ms Dodds warned that not undertaking a circuit-breaker now "could cost our economy £150 million" and asked the Chancellor if he had estimated the costs of not implementing harsher restrictions nationally.
Mr Sunak said: "The honourable lady talks about a rolling programme. It's very clear that the party opposite thinks we should have a rolling programme of national lockdowns.
"What I can tell her is that would be enormously damaging for people's jobs and livelihoods causing unnecessary pain and suffering in parts of the country where the virus prevalence is low. A localised approach is the best approach."
More to follow...